The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods
The fatal flaw with radioactive dating methods - Adult chat hehe cam
Relying on the studies of the above textile experts, Ronald Hatfield, a scientist with Beta Analytic (the world’s leading laboratory specializing in radiocarbon dating), reckons that a sample consisting of such proportions (40 : 60) would have contained a markedly larger number of C14 isotopes, which would have fatally vitiated the results of the 1988 dating.Today we have positive scientific proof that the radiocarbon datings of the artifact carried out in 1988 were fatally flawed.
And so they continue to do today, profiting from every occasion to spread this false information.The C14 method is most suitable for materials that are several thousands of years old.In 1988 the C14 method was used to determine the age of the Shroud.Following the recent public exposition of the Holy Shroud of Turin (April 10–June 23, 2010), the world needs to be informed that the radiocarbon dating carried out on the artifact in 1988 were fatally flawed.That procedure was carried out on a sample only forty percent of which consisted of the original ancient linen cloth.This exchange ceases at death, after which the level of C14 isotope in the dead matter begins to drop. Scientists determine the age of an artifact by gauging the level of the C14 isotope present in it at the moment of death and by measuring the rate of its decay.
The present state of the technology allows us to determine the age of objects that are less than 50 000 years old.Luigi Gonella on December 12, 2003, he personally carried out a series of C14 datings.For this purpose he also had several yarn segments from the Raes sample, which he had received, also from Dr. In addition, using a special adhesive tape, Rogers took thirty-two more samples from the surface of the entire Shroud.The fact needs to reach the public, as the mass media continue to rely on those vitiated results.This amounts to an act of patent manipulation and disinformation.Subsequent testing on the other saved half of the Raes sample revealed that the fragment used for the C14 datings was different in chemical composition from the main part of the Shroud. It disqualifies the sample in question and casts doubt on the results of the 1988 dating. Marino along with several textile experts examined photos of the sample of the Shroud taken for radiocarbon dating.